Process chain · HSV corrections · epistemic walls
Scientific methods
Publication shows method discipline, not automatic truth. Hash identity supports custody; it does not upgrade claims. Cross-validation completeness is audited from physical returns only.
Status: METHODS_BOARD_C1
Evidence class: EPISTEMIC_PROTOCOL · Claim ceiling C1 · no promotion
BODYTWIN_VALIDATED=NO · LIVE_FIREWALL=NO · TAGMATA=SOURCE_GAP
Chain
Process
- HASH_MATCH ≠ CLAIM_TRUTH
- HASH_MATCH ≠ SCIENTIFIC_TRUTH
- ENGINEERING_PASS ≠ SCIENTIFIC_VALIDATION
- HTTP_200 ≠ CAPABILITY_VALIDATION
- AGENT_AGREEMENT ≠ REPLICATION
- DISPLAY_TEXT ≠ AUTHORITATIVE without serialization bind
- WORKSPACE ≠ EXECUTED_RETURN
- DOI ≠ OPEN_LICENSE
- VISUAL_SALIENCE ≠ EVIDENCE_STRENGTH
Process gap
THREE_ROUND_CROSSVALIDATION
Public field: NOT_ESTABLISHED · Mistral R1/R2/R3=WORKSPACE_ONLY
Mistral R1/R2/R3 as supplied are WORKSPACE/ATTACK plans, not fully executed materialized cross-validation returns. THREE_ROUND_PROTOCOL_COMPLETED = NOT_ESTABLISHED. Missing executed returns were not synthesized.
Corrections
C1–C5 applied before publication
C1_CLT: germane = resource allocation (not unqualified additive three-load doctrine)C2_UNCERTAINTY_VIZ: tested-condition language onlyC3_HICK_HYMAN: HF relation + HCI hypothesis; not validated UI lawC4_RAG: diagnostic proxy; not hard gate / resilience proofC5_OPEN_SOURCE: absolute OS independence withdrawn
Bibliography anchors (8): see HSV derivative · Machine /research/methods/state.json